Reporting · Operations · Business Intelligence

I make reporting dependable, from the first signal to the decision it supports.

I build recurring reporting, quality checks, and operating handoffs that hold up under review.

Reporting Rhythm
Reporting Rhythm Reporting moves from recurring signals through definition and quality checks to management review and a recorded next action. SIGNAL CHECK REVIEW DECISION
  1. SIGNALRecurring business inputs
  2. CHECKDefinitions, quality, exceptions
  3. REVIEWManagement-ready reporting
  4. DECISIONNext action recorded
Approximately 85% → 98% on-time delivery across 50+ cycles. On-time deliveryAcross 50+ cycles
01 / Selected Work

Work in practice

Three professional systems, each showing a different part of reporting and operations ownership.

Professional work leads. Technical and earlier work are labelled separately.

Jan 2024–Present Professional current

Recurring Reporting System

My ownership spans the recurring KPI cycle, from source checks and preparation to management summary and recurring questions.

Preparation reduced 35%, from about eight hours to five per cycle.

See the reporting system
V-101 / Weekly reporting cadence
Weekly reporting cadence Weekly reporting moves from recurring inputs through definition checks, preparation, management review, and recorded action. INPUTSDEFINITIONSPREPAREREVIEWACTION
Recurring inputs are checked and prepared before management review; the next action returns to the following cycle.
Jun 2024–Jan 2025 Paid client

Multi-Source Data Quality Recovery

Across seven paid months, I collected and standardized three sources, led the quality recovery, and documented the client handoff.

163,229 consolidated records produced 141,228 analysis-ready records.

See the recovery case
V-201 / Source · validate · recover
Three-source data-quality recovery Three anonymous source platforms with different structures enter a repeatable collection workflow that retains lineage before validation and recovery. SOURCE ASOURCE BSOURCE C VALIDATERETAIN LINEAGE RECOVERCOMMON WORKFLOW
Anonymous sources stay distinct until a common workflow can validate and account for them.
Jan 21–Mar 4, 2026 Professional current

Programme Operations System

For a distributed cohort, I coordinated intake, team formation, progress visibility, blocker follow-up, submission, feedback, and reusable handoff.

35 participants, seven teams, and a reusable 16-phase process.

See the operations system
V-301 / Teams · phases · handoff
Thirty-five participants across seven teams Thirty-five anonymous participants were coordinated across seven teams through one shared operating rhythm; no individual data is shown. T1T2T3T4T5T6T7 35 PARTICIPANTS · 7 TEAMS · ONE OPERATING RHYTHM
Seven anonymous team lanes converge on a shared checkpoint and handoff rhythm.
Technical proof / supporting work Aug 2026 · Synthetic case study

Synthetic portfolio project — not paid production experience.

Operations Reporting Control Tower

A bounded Power BI and reporting-controls case with a documented model, 12/12 quality controls, 7/7 reconciliations, and a static PBIX.

12/12 controls · 7/7 reconciliations Inspect the technical case →
Original synthetic-proof abstraction
Synthetic inputsSQL modelControlsStatic PBIX
12/12 quality controls7/7 reconciliations

Static technical evidence only. No live refresh, client, cloud, or production environment is implied.

Supporting register

Other evidence, with the dates kept visible

Public-data analysis and earlier work remain useful when their chronology and limits stay explicit.

PUBLIC_ANALYSIS / PORTFOLIO_RECONSTRUCTIONOriginal work/source: 2023Audited portfolio reconstruction: 2026

Freelancer Market Intelligence Audit

A public-data cleaning audit that accounted for 29,326 inputs, 27,348 clean records, and 1,978 repeated IDs.

100% of inputs accounted for · 93.26% cleanView the public dataset (opens in a new tab)
PUBLIC_ANALYSIS / PORTFOLIO_RECONSTRUCTIONOriginal work: 2025Portfolio reconstruction: 2026

GitHub Ecosystem Monitor

A public-metadata audit with 14,644 clean repository rows and zero duplicate owner/repository identities.

14,644 clean rows · zero duplicate identitiesView the public dataset (opens in a new tab)
EARLIER_PROJECTEarlier work · 2023

BookLens

An earlier SQL/PostgreSQL project retained as historical evidence, not as the ceiling of current work.

Historical PostgreSQL / SQL method evidenceView BookLens on GitHub (opens in a new tab)
02 / Writing

Selected writing

Reporting · dashboards · data quality · judgment

Data quality / identity resolution

Customer ID, Email, Or Name: Which One Should You Trust?

Shows how choosing the wrong identifier can quietly distort a customer-level analysis.

Measurement / comparison design

Stop Comparing Everything To Last Month

Explains why the nearest prior period is not always the most useful benchmark.

View selected writing →
03 / Experience

Experience behind the work

The cases above come from current reporting work, a seven-month client engagement, and a distributed programme. These compact entries keep the setting and dates clear.

Jan 2024–Present

Data Career Jumpstart

Reporting & Operations Analyst

Owns recurring KPI reporting and supports programme operations for a remote education and career-development business.

Improved on-time reporting from about 85% to 98% across 50+ cycles.

Jun 2024–Jan 2025

Novae, LLC

Data Analyst (Contract)

Delivered a multi-phase data collection, standardization, recovery, and handover engagement.

Produced 141,228 analysis-ready records from three source platforms.

Apr 2025–Present

Explain the Data

Founder & Publisher

Publishes practical guidance on reporting, dashboards, data quality, and analytical judgment.

Read about how I work →